◆ Strategy service

Your FDA pathway,
mapped by a
senior consultant.

Not sure if you need a 510(k), De Novo, PMA, or if you’re even regulated? Before you spend time and money on the wrong path, spend two weeks getting a defensible answer from someone who’s done it hundreds of times.

  • Fixed fee · from $4,800
  • 2-week turnaround
  • Credited toward 510(k) service
Regulatory Strategy ReportFinal · Delivered
Device
CardioFlex Ablation System
Single-use RF catheter + generator
Recommended
Traditional 510(k)
Class II · 21 CFR 870.3610 · Product code KZH
Predicate
K211045 — Biosense Webster
95% similarity score · 3 alternatives identified
Timeline
8–12 months to clearance
Based on current FDA review times for Class II cardiac devices
Key risks
Ceramic tip material — biocompat rationale required
Recommend ISO 10993-1 pathway or equivalence analysis
Next steps
3 actions mapped, prioritized
Test plan, biocompat strategy, predicate confirmation
What’s included

A documented regulatory strategy. Not a verbal opinion.

01

Pathway recommendation

510(k) vs. De Novo vs. PMA vs. exempt — with supporting rationale, device class, product code, and 21 CFR citation. Defensible to investors and FDA.

02

Predicate shortlist

Top 5 clearances identified as potential predicates with similarity scores. Initial SE comparison framework included as a starting point for your submission.

03

Requirements map

Every testing, documentation, and labeling requirement for your chosen pathway — mapped to eSTAR sections and broken into a prioritized action list.

04

Risk & gap analysis

Flags the specific areas where your device is most likely to face FDA questions — novel features, biocompatibility, software, combination product status — with suggested mitigations.

05

Timeline & budget estimate

Realistic timeline from your current state to FDA submission, with key milestones. Budget estimate for testing, user fees, and Complizen service tiers.

06

Q-Sub recommendation

A clear recommendation on whether a Pre-Submission meeting is worth pursuing for your device — and if so, what questions to bring to FDA.

The pathways explained

Which pathway is right for your device?

PathwayDevice classTypical timelineUser fee (FY2025)When to use
Traditional 510(k)Most commonClass II6–12 months$24,320Substantially equivalent to a cleared predicate
Special 510(k)Class II3–6 months$24,320Design changes to your own cleared device
De NovoClass II (novel)12–24 months$37,000Novel device with no cleared predicate — creates a new product code
PMAClass III2–4 years$456,000+High-risk device — life-sustaining or implanted
ExemptClass I / some IINo review$0Low-risk device meeting specific exemption criteria

User fees as of FY2025. Timelines based on current CDRH performance data — subject to change.

“The regulatory strategy review pointed us at the right pathway from day one — with citations. We knew we weren't missing something critical, and that confidence is hard to put a price on.”
Ángel Enríquez
Ángel Enríquez, Ph.D.
Founder & CEO, EmboaMed
Pricing
$4,800
Fixed fee · 2-week turnaround
  • Full strategy report (10–20 pages)
  • 1-hour consultant debrief call
  • 2 weeks of follow-up Q&A
  • 100% credited toward 510(k) service
Get started →
Start with strategy

Know your path before you spend a dollar on the wrong one.

Schedule a callReady to build? See 510(k) service →